ALIF EXPLORATION
Selected Variables
base: Code of the patient
covariates:
- Age
- Gender
- Prior Spine Surgery
- '1st surgeon: experience in ASD surgery'
- ASA classification
- Decompression
- Osteotomy
- 3CO
- SPOs
- BMI_First Visit
- Tobacco use_First Visit
- Osteoporosis / osteopenia
- Levels Previously operated - Lower
- LGap
- RLL
- RSA
- RPV
- Cobb LS curve (Degree)
- Number of Interbody Fusions
- 'Posterior Instrumented Fusion: Upper / Lower Levels'
- Alif
- LL-Lordosis Difference
outcomes_ql:
- 2Y. ODI - Score (%)
- 2Y. SRS22 - SRS Subtotal score
- 2Y. SF36 - MCS
- 2Y. SF36 - PCS
outcomes_radiology:
- 6W. Major curve Cobb angle
- 1Y. Major curve Cobb angle
- 6W. T1 Sagittal Tilt
- 1Y. T1 Sagittal Tilt
- 6W. Sagittal Balance
- 1Y. Sagittal Balance
- 6W. Global Tilt
- 1Y. Global Tilt
- 6W. Lordosis (top of L1-S1)
- 1Y. Lordosis (top of L1-S1)
- 6W. LGap
- 1Y. LGap
- 6W. Pelvic Tilt
- 1Y. Pelvic Tilt
- 6W. RSA
- 1Y. RSA
- 6W. RPV
- 1Y. RPV
- 6W. RLL
- 1Y. RLL
predictive:
- Weight (kgs)_First Visit
- Height (cm)_First Visit
- Total surgical time st1+st2+st3
- Osteotomy
- Alcohol/drug abuse
- Anemia or other blood disorders
- Osteoarthritis
- Mild vascular
- Depression / anxiety
- Diabetes with end organ damage
- Cardiac
- Hypertension
- Chronic pulmonary disease
- Nervous system disorders
- Renal
- Peripheral vascular disease
- Psychiatric / Behavioral
- Peptic ulcer
- Bladder incontinence
- Bowel incontinence
- Leg weakness
- Loss of balance
- NRS back - Leg pain - Average
- Tobacco use_First Visit
- Years with spine problems
- ODI - Score (%)_First Visit
- SRS22 - SRS Total score_First Visit
- SF36 - PCS_First Visit
- SF36 - MCS_First Visit
- Major curve Cobb angle
demographic:
- Age
- Gender
- Prior Spine Surgery
- ASA classification
- 3CO
- BMI_First Visit
- Global Tilt
- Ideal LL
- Lordosis (top of L1-S1)
- ODI - Score (%)_First Visit
- SRS22 - SRS Total score_First Visit
- SF36 - PCS_First Visit
- SF36 - MCS_First Visit
- Major curve Cobb angle
expanded:
- Age
- Gender
- Prior Spine Surgery
- '1st surgeon: experience in ASD surgery'
- ASA classification
- Decompression
- Osteotomy
- 3CO
- SPOs
- BMI_First Visit
- Tobacco use_First Visit
- Osteoporosis / osteopenia
- Levels Previously operated - Lower
- LGap
- RLL
- RSA
- RPV
- Cobb LS curve (Degree)
- Number of Interbody Fusions
- 'Posterior Instrumented Fusion: Upper / Lower Levels'
- Alif
- LL-Lordosis Difference
- Weight (kgs)_First Visit
- Height (cm)_First Visit
- Total surgical time st1+st2+st3
- Alcohol/drug abuse
- Anemia or other blood disorders
- Osteoarthritis
- Mild vascular
- Depression / anxiety
- Diabetes with end organ damage
- Cardiac
- Hypertension
- Chronic pulmonary disease
- Nervous system disorders
- Renal
- Peripheral vascular disease
- Psychiatric / Behavioral
- Peptic ulcer
- Bladder incontinence
- Bowel incontinence
- Leg weakness
- Loss of balance
- NRS back - Leg pain - Average
- Years with spine problems
- ODI - Score (%)_First Visit
- SRS22 - SRS Total score_First Visit
- SF36 - PCS_First Visit
- SF36 - MCS_First Visit
- Major curve Cobb angle
- SRS22 - SRS Subtotal score_First Visit
- T1 Sagittal Tilt
- Sagittal Balance
- Global Tilt
- Lordosis (top of L1-S1)
- Pelvic TiltPropensity Scores Common Support
Model Stats
- Treatment proportion: 0.118
- Model Type: elastic_net
- Accuracy: 0.9025641
- Params: alpha: 0.1 lambda: 0.0032359
Average Treatment Effects - Radiology
Outcome: 6W. Major curve Cobb angle
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-72.0000 -21.1525 -10.9750 -4.0000 27.5500
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 22.650482584454
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 13.6548765550606
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
ATE (Yes-No): 2.307 (Std.Error: 4.316)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): 2.696 (Std.Error: 4.506)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -6.757 (Std.Error: 5.755)
Observational differences in treatment 2.634 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 23.61944
2: No 20.98496`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. Major curve Cobb angle
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-64.000 -22.785 -10.000 -3.000 22.440
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 21.5458662067798
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 14.3992415137597
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.75
ATE (Yes-No): -1.306 (Std.Error: 9.419)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -0.817 (Std.Error: 9.762)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -13.227 (Std.Error: 9.06)
Observational differences in treatment 3.876 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 24.72233
2: No 20.84643`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. T1 Sagittal Tilt
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-22.181906 -6.000000 -1.505162 1.596953 18.000000
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 6.5415287611348
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 5.8851768848087
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
ATE (Yes-No): -4.729 (Std.Error: 1.785)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -4.955 (Std.Error: 1.849)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): 0.706 (Std.Error: 3.371)
Observational differences in treatment -1.965 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -4.603244
2: No -2.638455`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. T1 Sagittal Tilt
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-22.000000 -6.000000 -2.018531 1.038160 20.000000
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 7.00310806375334
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 5.90951275955555
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
ATE (Yes-No): -3.564 (Std.Error: 2.057)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -3.75 (Std.Error: 2.124)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): 0.518 (Std.Error: 3.025)
Observational differences in treatment -1.491 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -4.099762
2: No -2.609148`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. Sagittal Balance
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-192.0000 -69.0075 -30.0050 -0.7175 89.0000
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 51.5280795984595
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 52.4452131341047
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.4
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.75
ATE (Yes-No): -33.923 (Std.Error: 14.214)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -35.634 (Std.Error: 14.691)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): 0.15 (Std.Error: 25.031)
Observational differences in treatment -17.122 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 16.58457
2: No 33.70692`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. Sagittal Balance
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-192.5100 -67.2100 -30.3250 6.0475 89.3700
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 55.5816899164131
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 52.75061113174
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
ATE (Yes-No): -32.422 (Std.Error: 16.469)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -33.249 (Std.Error: 16.998)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -13.399 (Std.Error: 25.743)
Observational differences in treatment -18.922 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 18.76893
2: No 37.69094`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. Global Tilt
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-57.000 -18.115 -6.090 1.880 149.410
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 14.6165869618543
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 14.7472349841479
Params: nrounds: 100.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
ATE (Yes-No): -8.144 (Std.Error: 3.669)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -8.373 (Std.Error: 3.83)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -3.048 (Std.Error: 5.567)
Observational differences in treatment -6.928 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 18.07389
2: No 25.00188`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. Global Tilt
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-37.060 -16.205 -5.790 1.000 26.000
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 15.4688745829409
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 11.4274573983862
Params: nrounds: 100.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
ATE (Yes-No): -11.483 (Std.Error: 4.159)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -11.762 (Std.Error: 4.265)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -5.306 (Std.Error: 8.212)
Observational differences in treatment -5.792 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 20.13759
2: No 25.92920`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. Lordosis (top of L1-S1)
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-71.00 -24.00 -9.85 0.00 29.00
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 18.5847775183469
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 15.617838335267
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.4
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
ATE (Yes-No): -2.637 (Std.Error: 6.253)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -2.384 (Std.Error: 6.523)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -8.56 (Std.Error: 6.633)
Observational differences in treatment -1.752 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -51.3150
2: No -49.5634`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. Lordosis (top of L1-S1)
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-67.87 -25.00 -8.01 0.00 23.38
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 22.3146183457342
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 15.6553644773089
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.75
ATE (Yes-No): -10.418 (Std.Error: 6.526)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -10.489 (Std.Error: 6.714)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -8.677 (Std.Error: 9.177)
Observational differences in treatment 1.84 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -47.61793
2: No -49.45805`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. LGap
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-71.0000 -24.5400 -9.3722 0.5004 78.9200
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 19.6420666844899
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 17.3428352905024
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.875
ATE (Yes-No): -3.407 (Std.Error: 6.962)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -3.328 (Std.Error: 7.305)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -5.254 (Std.Error: 6.681)
Observational differences in treatment -3.566 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 10.18330
2: No 13.74943`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. LGap
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-67.7242 -24.9922 -8.0484 0.2242 22.0800
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 22.6850437069752
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 15.8744008290482
Params: nrounds: 150.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
ATE (Yes-No): -11.644 (Std.Error: 7.754)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -11.608 (Std.Error: 8.043)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -12.528 (Std.Error: 8.593)
Observational differences in treatment -1.175 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 12.44743
2: No 13.62279`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. Pelvic Tilt
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-31.0000 -8.2775 -2.0750 2.1575 14.4200
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 10.8059387816646
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 7.38244936984984
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.75
ATE (Yes-No): -3.459 (Std.Error: 3.14)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -3.489 (Std.Error: 3.207)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -2.699 (Std.Error: 4.724)
Observational differences in treatment -3.942 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 18.14114
2: No 22.08345`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. Pelvic Tilt
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-26.620 -7.000 -2.005 2.000 23.000
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 9.96806582045828
Params: nrounds: 100.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 6.66554574216582
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.875
ATE (Yes-No): -7.238 (Std.Error: 3.554)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -7.497 (Std.Error: 3.708)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -0.992 (Std.Error: 3.577)
Observational differences in treatment -3.605 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 19.15069
2: No 22.75583`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. RSA
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-57.0000 -18.0867 -6.2346 2.1227 76.5028
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 15.5776727847706
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 12.8880388700647
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.8
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
ATE (Yes-No): -7.675 (Std.Error: 4.096)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -7.897 (Std.Error: 4.278)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -2.75 (Std.Error: 5.386)
Observational differences in treatment -5.371 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 7.350956
2: No 12.721711`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. RSA
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-37.0000 -16.5150 -5.7076 1.0000 25.0400
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 15.1126613560699
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 11.5843558928371
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.4
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
ATE (Yes-No): -11.408 (Std.Error: 4.324)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): -11.785 (Std.Error: 4.54)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): -3.046 (Std.Error: 6.414)
Observational differences in treatment -2.838 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes 10.68837
2: No 13.52673`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. RPV
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-85.555100 -2.242325 2.157300 8.204075 31.000000
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 10.0806392686394
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 8.59395331544651
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.4
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
ATE (Yes-No): 4.137 (Std.Error: 2.6)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): 4.245 (Std.Error: 2.736)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): 1.599 (Std.Error: 4.009)
Observational differences in treatment 3.603 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -4.665828
2: No -8.269321`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. RPV
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-22.1800 -1.4100 2.3588 6.4616 26.6346
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 10.3685381160092
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 1.0
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 6.50421319927846
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.875
ATE (Yes-No): 6.464 (Std.Error: 2.521)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): 6.693 (Std.Error: 2.561)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): 0.923 (Std.Error: 4.211)
Observational differences in treatment 1.186 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -7.267676
2: No -8.453427`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 6W. RLL
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-87.18180 -0.33685 9.36330 24.71500 71.00000
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 19.1964426265129
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.4
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.5
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 16.8619173828334
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.4
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.75
ATE (Yes-No): 3.168 (Std.Error: 6.609)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): 3.006 (Std.Error: 6.922)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): 6.955 (Std.Error: 7.878)
Observational differences in treatment 3.62 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -10.91046
2: No -14.53047`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
Outcome: 1Y. RLL
Distribution:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
-22.58000 -0.37805 8.02520 25.03075 67.70260
Model Type Y: boosting
RMSE: 24.1687258441796
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.625
Model Type No: boosting
RMSE: 15.9551845299249
Params: nrounds: 50.0
max_depth: 1
eta: 0.3
gamma: 0.0
colsample_bytree: 0.6
min_child_weight: 1.0
subsample: 0.75
ATE (Yes-No): 11.547 (Std.Error: 8.769)
Trimmed ATE (Yes-No): 11.534 (Std.Error: 9.192)
Upper ATE (Yes-No): 11.856 (Std.Error: 9.916)
Observational differences in treatment 1.639 (Yes-No)
treatment outcome
1: Yes -12.96230
2: No -14.60109`geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'
`geom_smooth()` using formula 'y ~ x'